INTRODUCTION
Teleconference is a kind of Telepsychiatry services for many years globally and has
today rapid development. In our country it is used from June 2001 (KLIMAKA's pilot
project)
A new program of Telepsychiatry was implemented for first time in Greece in the
process of evaluating and preparing patients, who were going to be transferred from
psychiatric hospitals to boarding houses. This program consisted of clinical applications,
specifically Telepsychiatry via video - conference, using Athens as the central
unit and Tripoli and Corfu, as peripheral units.
PURPOSE
The aim of this project is to explore the technical parameters of Telepsychiatry system's
application. The purpose was also to research the patients' as well as the mental
health professionals' reactions during a Telepsychiatry pilot project in the process
of de-instutionalisation.
MATERIAL- METHODOLOGY
The applications of the program concern:
o Assessments for psychiatric evaluation of patients
o Meetings via video - conferences between:
- the intervention team in Tripoli (psychologists, social workers, psychiatric nurses)
- psychiatrists in Athens
o Evaluation of patients' progress, who were accommodated in the boarding house,
within their vacation period, through
- meetings of the therapeutic group
- sessions with the patients
The project was evaluated through the use of questionnaires administered to
patients and mental health professionals. The goal of the study was to estimate the
parameters of the sessions, the impressions and reactions of the patients and the
mental health professionals, involved in the project.
The speed connection is 256 kbits/ sec (two lines ISDN). The sufficient bandwidth
for examining and making decisions concerning most mental disorders is 128kbits/sec,
as the Telepsychiatry Project of the Consolidated Department of Psychiatry of Harvard
medical School has showed.
RESULTS
During this project 76 sessions via video - conference took place: 32 of them were
assessments for psychiatric evaluation, 33 concerned group meetings ( 22 between
the intervention team in Tripoli and psychiatrists in Athens and 11between the boarding
house therapeutic group and the psychiatrists in Athens), and 11 sessions for the
progress of the patients in boarding house. The data selected concerns 43 patients
and 40 mental health professionals, who have used the video - conference system for
the first time.
From the patients' point of view
z 19 stated that they felt very comfortable during the contact with the Psychiatrist
through videoconference and 24 stated that they felt quite comfortable
z 37 stated that the time of the conference didn't create any problem and 6 stated
that the conference lasted long and they got tired.
z 23 stated that they preferred videoconference to communicate with the psychiatrist,
and 20 that they preferred face to face communication.
The mental health professionals who accompanied the patients to the room of the
videoconference, evaluated the collaboration of the patients through the following
questions (the results are shown to the following tables 1 and 2).
1. How much do you think that the
patient understood the meaning of
Telepsychiatry? (that a Psychiatrist
examines him or her from a distance?)
2. Did you find out that the behaviour
of the patient during the videoconference
of Telepsychiatry, was integrated
to the frame of his/her psychopathology
(for example his/her delusion
of persecution?)
From the mental health professionals'
point of view
z 34 found that the starting
procedure of the videoconference
is very easy, 6 that
it easy, and none of them
stated that it is less difficult
or very difficult
z 30 minutes were needed to learn how to operate the system for the connection
between the units
z 31 stated that they were very satisfied with the procedure, and 9 quite satisfied
z 40 (100%) stated that they were inclined to use again the system of
Telepsychiatry.
About the quality of sound and picture
In 76 videoconferences with total length of 138 hours, were mentioned:
-6 disconnections
-9 videoconferences with small problems of the picture (relevant vagueness)
and 6 with comparatively bigger problems (no regular movement)
-7 videoconferences with mild microphonism and 3 with a few sound disconnec-
tions.
Generally, the users of the system characterize the communication "very good" in 58
teleconferences, "good" in 10, and 8 "moderate".
CONCLUSIONS
z Only few technical problems were "recorded" during the teleconferences (disconnections,
problems of quality of the sound and the picture)
z The majority of the patients have accepted the new method of examination
without problems and the level of satisfaction from the method appears to be
high.
z The majority of mental health professionals found the video - conference system
very easy to use. On average 30 minutes were needed for them to learn how to
connect with the other unit. The majority was found to be very satisfied with the
procedure and they are all willing to use the video - conference system again.
z This study demonstrates that Telepsychiatry can have strong support from the
patients and all service providers.
z The study demonstrates that many patients with psychiatric problems can be
effectively managed in their local hospitals with good outcomes. The trauma of
having to move them away from their families and familiar surroundings can be
avoided and their recovery can take place in an environment in which they feel
safe.
REFERENCES
ALLEN D., ALLEN A., (1994) Telemental health services today. Telemedicine Today, 2 (2): 1, 24
BAER L., ELFORD R., CUCOR P., (1997) Telepsychiatry at forty: what have we learned. Harvard
Review of Psychiatry 5: 7-17
BASHSHUR R.L. (1995). On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemedicine Journal
1:19-30
GOSH G. J., MCLAREN P.M., WATSON J.P. (1997). Evaluating the alliance in video-link telethera-
py. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 3:33-5
GUSTKE S.S., BALCH D.C., WEST V.L., ROFERS L.O. Patients satisfaction with telemedicine services.
Telemedicine Journal, 6: 5-13
MILLER E. A. (2001). Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of
the literature. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7:1-17
PEREDNIA D. A. (1994). Evaluating the use of telemedicine for mental health applications.
Telemedicine Today 2, 2: 10-11, 1994
WAKEFIELD D.S., KIENZLE M. G., ZOLLO S.A., KASH J.B., UDEN- HOLMAN T. Health care providers'
perceptions of telemedicine services. Telemedicine Journal 3: 59-65
WOOTTON R., DARKINS A. (1997). Telemedicine and the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of
the Royal College of Physicians of London, 31: 598-9
EVALUATION OF A TELEPSYCHIATRY
CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Konstantakopoulos G., Zacharopoulou C., Valma V., Tsirika N., Yfantis, A., Katsadoros K.
Department of Research and Development
pdf